Tight oligopoly mobile markets in EU28 in 2015
NOTE: The "Tight oligoply mobile markets in EU28 in 2016" update of the below study has been released for DFMonitor-PRO subscribers (link).

January 2016
Comprehensive analysis of factors that give rise to unilateral anti-competitive effects leading to non-competitive outcomes and consumer harm in tight mobile oligopolies

- Half of EU28 mobile markets are tight oligopolies with non-competitive outcomes
- What are the factors that give rise to unilateral (non-coordinated) effects and lead to high or excessive mobile internet access prices and very restrictive gigabyte caps in tight oligopolies?

The cabinet of EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager and DG Competition have obtained access to the full report.

Free content
Free abstract, higihlights and key findings, table of contents and information on report pricing (6 pages, pdf) » Download here


Subscription content
Premium report (122 pages, pdf) » Download here



Tight Oligopoly Index ranking based on the 2nd Half 2015 price and data cap data sets:
Key questions answered in the 122-page report:
  • Do market concentration and the number (3, 4 or 5) of mobile network operators affect mobile internet access prices?
  • Does the presence of a no.4 challenger network operator (important competitive force) affect prices/caps?
  • Do operator group level fixed-line broadband interests (convergence/bundling) affect prices and gigabyte caps?
  • Do operator group level price discrimination (zero-rating) practices affect prices and gigabyte caps?
  • Does E5 operator ownership (Vodafone, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefonica and Telecom Italia that collectively control 62% of the market) affect prices/caps?
  • Does network-layer consolidation (active infrastructure and/or spectrum sharing) affect prices/caps?
  • Does MVNO presence (on commercial or merger mandated basis) affect prices/caps?
  • Do other endogenous (ARPU, ARPC) or exogenous (GDP, AIC, PLI) factors affect prices?
  • Does 4 to 3 mobile network consolidation increase the risk for non-competitive outcomes?
  • What are the factors that give rise to non-coordinated effects and lead to high or excessive mobile internet access prices and restrictive or very restrictive gigabyte caps in tight oligopolies?
  • What would turn the German mobile market to a perfect tight oligopoly (from 90% to 100% tight oligopoly index)?
  • Are mobile internet access prices affordable and is mobile broadband penetration/usage lower in tight oligopolies?
  • Have 4 to 3 mobile mergers led to higher prices and consumer harm?
  • Will the planned 4 to 3 mergers turn the UK, Italian and French markets into non-competitive tight oligopolies?
  • Will 4 to 3 consolidation in Sweden and Poland or the rumoured acquisition of Play in Poland by Liberty Global turn the Swedish and Polish markets to tight oligopolies with non-competitive outcomes?
  • Will the planned Cellcom and Golan Telecom merger turn the Israeli 5-MNO competitive market to a tight oligopoly?
  • Is BEREC right to be concerned and is ex ante regulation needed to remedy the competitive harm in tight oligopolies?
  • What are the recommended ex ante measures and merger control remedies for tight oligopolies?
BEREC’s report on oligopoly analysis and regulation

BEREC published in December 2015 a report (link) on oligopoly analysis and regulation. Fixed-mobile convergence, bundling and consolidation were according to BEREC trends that lead to oligopolistic market settings and may result to sub- or on-competitive market outcomes, high prices and consumer harm. Whereas in monopolies and collusive oligopolies effective competition is impeded due to single or joint dominance in tight oligopolies the non-competitive outcomes are the result of unilateral, non-coordinated effects i.e. the shared economic incentive of the oligopolists to raise prices close to monopoly levels. While European competition law addresses non-coordinated anti-competitive effects (e.g. in the cases of 4 to 3 mobile mergers) the current electronic communication framework does not explicitly address market failure of this kind (sub- or non-competitive outcomes in tight oligopolies). National regulatory authorities and the European Commission have currently no regulatory tools in their hands to remedy effective competition in tight oligopolies. Hence, according to BEREC, the review of the regulatory framework regarding the treatment of oligopolies must take into consideration the case for potential ex ante intervention not only in collusive (joint dominance) but also in tight oligopolies.

Abstract

In this study we examine a number of factors that are indentified in the theory of harm and which may trigger non-coordinated effects and could impede effective competition in mobile oligopolies resulting in sub- or non-competitive outcomes and consumer harm. We measure the intensity of the effect of the factors in question in the form of high or excessive mobile internet access prices and restrictive or very restrictive gigabyte caps using a comprehensive international benchmark among EU28 countries. Having observed the effect of the factors and their relative weights we synthesized a country level tight oligopoly index and ranked the EU28 mobile markets. The tight oligopoly index compiled by the factors that were shown to affect mobile internet access prices and gigabyte caps is shown to be a reliable predictor of country average mobile internet access price level. The tight oligopoly index is then used to assess the post-merger competition outcomes in markets that are currently under 4 to 3 consolidation (UK and Italy), markets where 4 to 3 consolidation is contemplated (France, Poland, Sweden) and in Israel where a 5 to 4 mobile merger has been announced. In the final step we propose a set of effective ex ante regulatory and merger control measures to remedy the significant impediment of effective competition in mobile tight oligopolies.
2016
spectrum
pricing
merger
mobile-first
zero-rating
Germany
DeutscheTelekom
Vodafone
Telefonica
Orange


Featured insights:

Capacity utilization and fixed-to-mobile broadband substitution potential – A study of 64 European operators
2017
networkeconomics
mobile-first
spectrum
5G
massiveMIMO
Finland
United Kingdom
Poland
Austria
Germany
Hutchison
Telefonica
Play
Elisa

March 2017
When LTE base stations are upgraded to 'Gigabit' speed the gigabyte volume capacity of the networks also greatly expands. We modelled LTE network capacity based on existing FDD and TDD spectrum holdings (and potential acquisitions in 2.3 and 3.4-3.8 GHz bands) and sizes of the macro site grids. Without and with Massive MIMO in the TDD bands. Topical for operators contemplating fixed-to-mobile broadband substitution ahead of upcoming 700, 1500 (SDL), 2300, 3400-3600 MHz spectrum auctions.

show me
List of all insights and external articles


The market is changing. Mobile data competitiveness metrics and insights for industry professionals
DFMonitor-PRO >


Contact us:

Tel: +358442032339
E-mail: contact@dfmonitor.eu
Twitter: @DFMonitor

Copyright © 2009-2017 Rewheel Oy. All rights reserved.